🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an event that started out as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has adopted a commercial tone, growing to encompass events where individuals of African heritage are paid to address predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the enterprise of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The tide has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

Initially celebrated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in February, but also in autumn in the Britain, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The observance has evolved since those days, focusing less on the narratives of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the celebration is observed is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a elected representative feels emboldened to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. At the same time, far-right parties are expanding in Europe as a complete entity.

In the America, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A campaign to erase the history of people of color and legacy from the historical documents is ongoing. One of the former president's initial presidential directives aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the month illustrates how little it can be influential if it is limited to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content festivities of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the realities of the present. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is needed. An academic expert, a professor at University of Greenwich, put it best when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just discontinue things like Black History Month entirely, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an era that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an framework that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not avoid politics, and leaves space for individuals, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What value has basic knowledge of the bygone era when it ignores the current situation of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Establishments who celebrate it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and alertness to minor insults, but challenged by the dangers that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and responsive. Maybe an total re-identification is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.